State v. Jamieson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Convicted of violating an ordinance, defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying her motion for new trial.
Defendant was licensed under the “Minneapolis Non-intoxicating Liquor Ordinance” to sell 3.2 beer. The ordinance (§25) provides:
“It shall be unlawful for any [such] licensee * * * to suffer or permit” upon the licensed premises “any mixing or spiking of malt liquor, soft drinks” or any other beverage “by adding to or uñth the same any * * * intoxicating liquor.” Nor may the licensee “sell or serve non-intoxicating liquor to any intoxicated…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. RobitshekSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- City of Red Wing v. NibbeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- City of St. Paul v. KeeleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
- State v. HokensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. EndSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- State v. PoagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- State v. SiporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- City of St. Paul v. GreeneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
- State v. McCabeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.