Legal Opinion

Cooper v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 2011No. 09-CF-209PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Senior Judge:

On December 16, 2008, a jury found appellant Andre Cooper guilty of first-degree fraud, two counts of uttering, and two counts of first-degree theft as a result of his involvement in two transactions designed to obtain hardwood flooring by tendering fraudulent checks. The trial court first dismissed the charges with prejudice, but on motion of the government, reinstated them. On appeal, Cooper argues that his trial date was set after the 180-day time frame provided by the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (hereinafter “IAD”) had lapsed, and therefore, the court should…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fex v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Rivas v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. United States v. Ronnie Dean HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. State v. CarrollWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Timberlake v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bynum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. KEVIN BYNUM and KEVIN WOMACK v. UNITED STATES.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API