Legal Opinion
Bynum v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 2016No. Nos. 14-CF-1007, 14-CF-1344PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
After a joint jury trial, appellants Kevin Bynum and Kevin Womack were convicted of receiving stolen property (“RSP”)1 and unauthorized use of a vehicle (“UUV”),2 among other offenses not challenged here. On appeal, appellant Bynum disputes the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his UUV and RSP convictions, and both appellants contest the admission of District of Columbia Department of Motor Vehicles (“DMV’) records. We affirm.
I. Background
On February 9, 2013, Officer Jeffrey Jones tried to stop a silver Chrysler Con*985corde after hearing a radio run describing a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Esteban Bahena-CardenasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Goldsberry v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Dutch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Floyd Long & Alonzo Ferrell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- Grimes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2021
- In re E.A.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2025
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
- JEROME PROCTOR, JR. v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.