State v. Blackbull
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Judge.
Appellant Solomon Blackbull, Jr. was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the first and second degrees, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.342(a) and 609.343(a) (1984). On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in excluding relevant evidence and instructing the jury that counsel’s duty is to present evidence on behalf of his client, and that the jury is to determine the question of guilt or innocence of the defendant. We affirm.
FACTS
Blackbull’s conviction arose out of report of sexual abuse involving him and two young girls, ages 8 and 6, in a trailer home on a farm site in Sibley…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- State v. RoseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. HaaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CasadyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. KnaakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. CasadyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986