Legal Opinion

State v. Rose

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 3, 1984No. C2-83-1715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

POPOVICH, Chief Judge.

J-ohn Rose appeals his conviction for criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.342(e) (1982) (sexual penetration with force or coercion and personal injury). He contends that his right to a fair trial was denied because of prosecutorial misconduct in the closing argument. He also questions evi-dentiary rulings of the trial court involving character evidence and use of prior convictions for impeachment. Finally, he contends the trial court’s instruction that an attorney’s duty includes presenting evidence in his client’s behalf…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. CaronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  3. State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  4. State v. StufflebeanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. WarholicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. State v. DillardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  3. State v. JensenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  5. State v. YangCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API