Legal Opinion

State v. Knaak

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 25, 1986No. C2-86-787PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant, Thomas Knaak, was found guilty by a jury of Driving After Suspension. He was sentenced to fifteen days to be stayed for six months upon the condition that he pay a $166 fine and have no further violations of the law. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court’s additional jury instructions precluded the jury from exercising leniency; in effect directed a verdict of guilty against him; and that the trial court imposed a harsh sentence as a penalty for appellant exercising his right to a jury trial. 1 We affirm in part but remand for resentencing.

FACTS

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BrouilletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. United States v. James Lee StockwellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. State v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  4. State v. MollbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. State v. MeanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. SandeferCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  2. VanHercke v. EastvoldCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. GreenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API