Legal Opinion

State v. Casady

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 26, 1986No. C6-86-372PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

A jury found appellant, Larry Casady, guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. The trial court sentenced Casady to a term of 116 months on one count. This was double the presumptive sentence. On appeal, Casady argues that: (1) there is insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted Spreigl evidence; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to admit into evidence sexually explicit magazines; (4) the prosecutor’s misconduct during closing argument constituted reversible…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  2. State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  2. State v. KasperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  3. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  4. State v. PieriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  5. State v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API