State v. Casady
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
A jury found appellant, Larry Casady, guilty of three counts of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree. The trial court sentenced Casady to a term of 116 months on one count. This was double the presumptive sentence. On appeal, Casady argues that: (1) there is insufficient evidence to sustain his conviction; (2) the trial court abused its discretion when it admitted Spreigl evidence; (3) the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to admit into evidence sexually explicit magazines; (4) the prosecutor’s misconduct during closing argument constituted reversible…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- State v. NorgaardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. RainerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. KasperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. PieriCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- State v. KasperCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.