Legal Opinion

McIntosh v. McIntosh

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 13, 1931No. 39891PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Grate, J.

This is an action in equity, in which the petition of plaintiff (appellee) seeks to offset mutual judgments, as recited in the foregoing statement. The primary issue here concerns itself with the filed answer of the defendant Robertson & Havens, and involves the question whether, under the facts, a duly noticed attorney’s lien is terminated in the offsetting of one judgment against the other. The facts in this particular, briefly stated, are as follows:

On December 13, 1923, the defendant Mary McIntosh obtained a judgment against Edith Keairnes (McIntosh) in the sum of $4,000, with interest…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anfenson v. BanksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  2. Hubbard v. EllithorpeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Baldwin v. LoweSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. DeLaval Separator Co. v. SharplessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  5. Hurst v. SheetsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. CoutantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Stookesberry v. BurgherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Axtell v. HarbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. In Re Will of LammSupreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  5. MacHeak v. AdamsenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API