Legal Opinion

MacHeak v. Adamsen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 16, 1931No. 40914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

Only one proposition is relied upon by appellant for a reversal, to wit, that the Municipal Court erred in relieving the. ear in question from a lien of the plaintiff-appellant’s contract, and in taxing one-third of the costs to plaintiff-appellant. The vital question involves the pleaded estoppel by the appellee Porter. The facts are not in serious dispute and the governing legal principles are well recognized. We will briefly review the law governing estoppel in pais.

The appellee Porter had the burden of proving that he was unaware of the facts on which he bases estoppel, and had no…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Loranz & Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  2. Atlas Security Co. v. O'DonnellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  3. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  4. King v. KnudsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. McIntosh v. McIntoshSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Alexander v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  2. Egbert v. DuckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1948
  3. Meltzer v. ShaferSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  4. Bates v. KleveSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API