Legal Opinion

Stookesberry v. Burgher

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1935No. 42786PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This is an action seeking recovery upon a promissory note for $4,000. This is the second appeal. The opinion on the former appeal will be found in Mitchell v. Burgher, 216 Iowa 869, 249 N. W. 357.

The action was originally brought in May, 1929, naming L. A. Burgher and John Burgher as defendants. Both of the defendants were nonresidents of the state of Iowa, and jurisdiction against one of them, John Burgher, was obtained through the process of attachment. Upon the first trial of the case in the district court the defendant John Burgher appeared and defended alleging, first, that the note in…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Linnemann v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  2. Hoffman v. MaloratskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  3. Beechley v. BeechleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  4. City Bank of Mitchellville v. AlcornSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  5. McClanahan v. McClanahanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cromwell v. HosbrookSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Davenport Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n v. Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Khabbaz v. SwartzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  4. Halvorson v. City of DecorahSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Smith v. CoutantSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API