Nina Ricci, S.A.R.L. v. Gemcraft Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KRAM, District Judge.
This case involves a malodorous dispute between the manufacturers of two fragrant perfumes over the right to use the words. “L’Air” in the appellation of their products. Plaintiffs have moved for a preliminary injunction barring defendants from calling their perfume (and any new related products they market) “L’air D’or.” For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs commenced this action on March 15, 1985, by filing a complaint alleging trademark infringement, unfair competition, and dilution under New York…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Abercrombie & Fitch Company v. Hunting World, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States Polo Ass'n v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Paco Sport, Ltd. v. Paco Rabanne ParfumsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Glow Industries, Inc. v. LopezDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Hutton v. KlabalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Elizabeth Taylor Cosmetics Co. v. Annick Goutal, S.A.R.L.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.