Legal Opinion

United States Polo Ass'n v. PRL USA Holdings, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 13, 2011No. 09 Civ. 9476PublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

In this action, the plaintiffs United States Polo Association, Inc. (“USPA”) and USPA Properties, Inc. (“Properties”) (collectively, the “USPA Parties” or “Plaintiffs”) sought a declaration pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201: (1) that they have the right to license and sell in the United States fragrance products and packaging bearing “U.S. POLO ASSN.,” the Double Horsemen Trademark and “1890,” and other products bearing the marks identified in Trademark Application Serial Nos. 77/738,-105, 77/760,033 and 77/760,071 on the products identified in those applications; (2)…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Weinberger v. Romero-BarceloSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Polaroid Corporation v. Polarad Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Estate of Ellington Ex Rel. Ellington v. Harbrew Imports Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
  2. Vox Amplification Ltd. v. MeussdorfferDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Rovio Entertainment, Ltd. v. Allstar Vending, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  5. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Book Dog Books, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API