Legal Opinion
Saliter v. Pierce Brothers Mortuaries
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 24, 1978No. Civ. 51694PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STEPHENS, J. —
This is an appeal from an order of dismissal entered after the trial court sustained defendant’s demurrer to plaintiff’s second amended complaint without granting leave to amend. The trial judge determined that plaintiff’s complaint showed that his action for personal injuries was barred by the statute of limitations. (Code Civ. Proc., § 340, subd. 3.) We agree.
The material facts as contained within the second amended complaint are averred as follows: On October 23, 1974, plaintiff’s father died. The circumstances of death are not disclosed by the complaint, although…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- Baker v. Beech Aircraft Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1974
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Hamilton Materials, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- CAMSI IV v. Hunter Technology Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
- Mariann HOPKINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DOW CORNING CORPORATION, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Alfred Gerome Nelson and Vida Nelson v. International Paint CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.