People v. Humphrey
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
MARTINEZ, Justice.
The People bring this interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s suppression of statements made by the Defendant, Andrea Humphrey, during a custodial interrogation *354by a police officer. The trial court found the statements were both involuntary and made pursuant to an invalid waiver of Humphrey’s rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694. The People contend that the trial court erred as a matter of law and lacked a factual basis for its judgment. We agree with the People in part. Consequently, we reverse the ruling of the trial court…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Colorado v. SpringSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Effland v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2010
- People v. LaRosaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. MadridSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- People v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
- People v. BosticColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.