Legal Opinion

Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 7, 1996No. 15244PublishedCited by 65 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

This case raises an issue of first impression for this court — that is, the effect of intentional spoliation of evidence in a products liability case. In August, 1990, the plaintiffs, Marks Beers and John Hornyak,1 brought an action against the defendant Bayliner Marine Corporation,2 pursuant to the Connecticut Product Liability Act; General Statutes § 52-572m et seq.; for damages as a result of personal injuries they sustained while traveling in a motor *771boat. After the pleadings were closed, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which was grounded on spoliation…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  2. State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
  3. Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by65 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  5. Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000

60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API