Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.
This case raises an issue of first impression for this court — that is, the effect of intentional spoliation of evidence in a products liability case. In August, 1990, the plaintiffs, Marks Beers and John Hornyak,1 brought an action against the defendant Bayliner Marine Corporation,2 pursuant to the Connecticut Product Liability Act; General Statutes § 52-572m et seq.; for damages as a result of personal injuries they sustained while traveling in a motor *771boat. After the pleadings were closed, the trial court granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, which was grounded on spoliation…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Haesche v. KissnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MoralesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- CBS Inc. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Schroeder v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Torres v. El Paso Electric Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
- Lea Ann Tatham v. Bridgestone Americas Holding, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
- Rizzuto v. Davidson Ladders, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Richardson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.