Legal Opinion
Decker v. Dreisen-Freedman, Inc.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided July 20, 1956No. 1792PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOOD, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs (now appellants) filed a complaint for damages for trespass to their real property, naming as defendants Dreisen-Freedman, Inc., a corporation, Dreisen and Freedman, Inc., a corporation, and Joseph Snyder, alleged to be the agent of the first named corporation. Although a single answer was filed on behalf of “the defendants” there was evidence at trial tending to show that the defendant Dreisen and Freedman, Inc., did not exist. However, at the close of plaintiffs’ evidence the court directed a verdict in favor of both corporate defendants. At the close of the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Cold Metal Process Co. v. United Engineering & Foundry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
- Gold Seal Co. v. Weeks, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- Vale v. BonnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Decker v. Dreisen-Freedman, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Golden Commissary Corporation v. ShipleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
- Kapneck v. RosenfieldDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
- Sager v. SagerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Wood v. G.S.A. Region 3 Employees F.C.U.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958