Legal Opinion

Vale v. Bonnett

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided June 7, 1951No. 10790PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Circuit Judge.

Clarence Vale brought this suit for negligent injury against Edward Somerville, Howard G. Bonnett, and Mary Borisow. Summary judgment was entered in favor of Borisow, who is not a party to the present appeal. Default was noted against Somerville and referred for inquisition as do damages. Subsequent to the above proceedings, a summary judgment was entered in favor of Bonnett. From that judgment, plaintiff brings this appeal.

During argument, the presiding Judge suggested that amended Rule 54(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., had not been followed in the entry of this…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sweeney v. ErvingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Dewey v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  4. Davis v. John L. Whiting & Son Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  5. David v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1955
  2. Neal, Admr. v. Home Builders, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1953
  3. n.sidney Nyhus v. Travel Management CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  4. Ariola v. NigroIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Plouffe v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API