Legal Opinion

Kapneck v. Rosenfield

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 1, 1956No. 1832PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HOOD, Associate Judge.

This action was commenced by appellant against the Property Clerk of. Metropolitan Police Department to recover $500 then in the custody of the clerk and alleged to rightfully belong to appellant. The-Property Clerk answered, that the money was deposited with him as the proceeds of a crime and that • its ownership was disputed,, and asked leave to deposit the money in court for final determination of ownership. In addition to appellant three others made claims to the fund. One claimant apparently abandoned its claim and when the case came on for hearing three parties —…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Decker v. Dreisen-Freedman, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Golden Commissary Corporation v. ShipleyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API