Legal Opinion
Remington Arms Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided December 30, 1992No. Civ. A. 89-420-JLLPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
LATCHUM, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, has brought this motion before the Court, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, seeking summary judgment on plaintiffs failure to prove the existence and contents of certain missing insurance policies. (Docket Item [“D.I.”] 343.) Plaintiff, Remington Arms Company, in responding to defendant’s motion, has requested permission to move for summary judgment in its favor on the same issue. (D.I. 382 at 4 note 3.) As plaintiff has demonstrated, this Court has the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lopinto v. HainesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- United States v. Guy E. McGaughey Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Burroughs Wellcome Co. v. Commercial Union InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
- Dart Industries, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Rubenstein v. Royal Insurance of AmericaMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Hoechst Celanese Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Servants of the Paraclete, Inc. v. Great American InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.