Legal Opinion

Hall v. Noble Drilling (U.S.) Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2001No. 00-60063, 00-60065PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge:

This admiralty case involves the calculation of maintenance. Plaintiffs James Hall and Charles Byron Stuart are seamen employed by defendant Noble Drilling (U.S.) Inc. (“Noble”) who were injured during their employment on offshore rigs. The district court awarded maintenance of $30.50 to Stuart and $31.50 to Hall, based in part on the costs of their shelter, homes that they share with their families.

Noble argues that maintenance is provided solely for the benefit of the seaman, and thus the maintenance rate should have been reduced to reflect only the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Calmar Steamship Corp. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Farrell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Harden v. GordonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · 1823

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Block Island Fishing, Inc. v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  2. Boudreaux v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Chad Barnes v. Sea Hawaii Rafting, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. Jody King v. Huntress, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
  5. Brown v. Cassens Transport Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API