Legal Opinion

Fillbach v. Van Camp

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1924No. File No. 5623PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPolley, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus brought to compel the insurance commissioner to' issue to plaintiff a warrant for $386 in payment of damages sustained by plaintiff, because of injury caused by hail to 60 acres of wheat, on the 28th *408day of July, 1923. That’plaintiff had the wheat, and that it was injured as alleged 'by plaintiff, is admitted by defendant. But defendant alleges that the wheat in question had not been listed by the assessor nor reported by the owner for hail insurance to either the assessor or the county auditor, and that for that reason said wheat was not insured.

The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bossen v. OlsnessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Brown v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Osterkamp v. ZiglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. State ex rel. Schmidt v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Mahoney v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Hoeck v. CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API