Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Helgerson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1928No. File No. 6375PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

Plaintiff sought mandamus in the circuit court to compel the defendant, as commissioner of insurance, to approve, adjust, and pay to plaintiff the amount of damage done by hail to plaintiff’s growing crop in July, 1925, contending that said crop was insured under the provisions of the state hail insurance law. The defense was that the crop in question was not so insured for the season of 1925.

The facts were stipulated, and are as follows: Plaintiff owned the northeast quarter of section 26, township 99, range 78, Tripp county, on which premises one Nolan was tenant, plaintiff having' a third…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. Board of Com'rs.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Stavig v. Van CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Fillbach v. Van CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Osterkamp v. ZiglerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  5. State ex rel. Schmidt v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brams v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ehly v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Pickrell v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Waldorf v. LewisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API