Bossen v. Olsness
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court of Burleigh County, Nuessle, J. “The' crops insured under this act shall consist of all crops grown on cultivated land actually cropped, subject to and paying the taxes herein specified.” Chap. 160 of the Laws of . 1919 as amended by chap. 38 of the laws of the Special Session of 1919 (§5). The court will take judicial notice of the fact that in this state there is a large amount of unbroken land. § 7938 subdss. 35, N. D. Comp. Daws 1913.
1Opinion of the CourtBirdzell, J.
This is an appeal from an order overruling the defendant’s motion to dismiss a petition for a writ of mandamus, and also overruling a demurrer to the petition. The essential facts set forth in the petition are in substance as follows: The plaintiff is and was, in the spring and summer of ‘1920, the owner of certain lands in Mercer county. In that year he cultivated a certain acreage of his land and sowed crops thereon as follows: 100 acres of wheat, 25 acres of flax, 20 acres of barley, 35 acres of millet, and 35 acres of corn. The assessor did not return to the county auditor any of the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Davis v. County of McLeanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
- Fillbach v. Van CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Brown v. NelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
- Schmitz v. Olsness Ex Rel. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
- McEwen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.