Legal Opinion

Hoeck v. Camp

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1925No. File No. 5619Published

1Opinion of the Court

MORIARTY, C.

The commissioner of insurance takes this appeal from a judgment of the trial court granting to respondent a peremptory writ of mandamus directing appellant, as such commissioner, to allow the respondent’s claim for hail damage's to his *629crop of flax. The local assessor did not list the land as cultivated land, nor did respondent report to the county auditor that the land was in crop.

The appeal in this action was taken at about the same time that the original proceeding in the case of Fillbach v. Van Camp, Commissioner, was presented to this court. And it is conceded by counsel for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fillbach v. Van CampSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API