Legal Opinion
Summers v. Freeman
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 18, 1954No. Civ. 16006PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment for $6,250 following a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, whose recovery was based upon a written agreement of employment between him as a real estate broker and the defendant.
On January 22, 1951, defendant-appellant Freeman approached plaintiff-respondent Summers. The appellant owned a piece of commercial property in South San Francisco and was interested in exchanging it for commercial property in San Francisco.
Respondent contacted owners of property in San Francisco including Maurice Stulsaft who owned the Land Development Company. Stulsaft gave…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barham v. BarhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Holmes v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Dale v. PalmerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hunt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Tetrick v. SloanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Ladd v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- STATE, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES FUND v. Industrial Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Robinson v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2013