Dowd v. Joyce
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WARNE, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff and appellant commenced an action in ejectment alleging ownership in lot 9, block 20, in the city of Oxnard and seeks to oust the defendants from possession thereof. Defendants, by answer, denied plaintiff’s ownership- and by cross-complaint defendant Immel alleged that he and plaintiff are father and daughter; that confidential relations existed between them; that in November, 1914, he was in poor health, and, at that time, had great confidence in the integrity of plaintiff and in her love and affection and devotion and fidelity to him; that at the time he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinberger v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Ward v. WatermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Fagan v. LentzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Byrne v.ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Howard v. StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by8 opinions
- Finnegan v. Royal Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. LoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Winning v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. RoblesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Benson v. HamiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.