Legal Opinion
United States v. Charles Medlin, B.A. McFarland and B.E. McFarland
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided July 29, 1985No. 84-1652PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARK, Chief Judge.
I
The United States appeals from the decision of the district court disbursing funds held in the court’s registry to Charles Medlin, B.A. McFarland and B.E. McFarland (collectively referred to as “the Medlins”). Because the court properly awarded such payments according to the stipulation of the parties, we affirm.
II
The Medlin litigation was one of twelve related suits, three of which are decided in the companion to this decision, United States v. O’Neil, 767 F.2d 1111 (5th Cir. 1985). Only those facts necessary to this appeal are discussed below. For a more thorough…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wallace G. Frederick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSON, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lone Star Industries, Inc. v. Rankin County Economic Development District (In Re New York Trap Rock Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- United States v. Alvin O'neil, United States of America v. Doko Farms, Etc., United States of America v. Paul MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Farms v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Dickman v. F.D.R. VA HospitalDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Tilcon Minerals, Inc. v. Orange & Rockland Utilities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.