Legal Opinion
3570 East Foothill Blvd., Inc. v. City of Pasadena
District Court, C.D. California
Decided October 6, 1997No. CV 95-5592 ABC RMCxPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT CITY OF PASADENA’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
COLLINS, District Judge.
Defendant’s motion for summary judgment or in the alternative partial summary judgment came on regularly for hearing before this Court on October 6,1997. After reviewing the materials submitted by the parties, argument of counsel, and the case file, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s motion is GRANTED.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
The facts of this case are well knoym to the parties and do not need to be recited here. A brief summary of the facts…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Marian Fontenot, Etc. v. The Upjohn CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Philip Young v. City of Simi ValleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Steven A. Diamond v. City of Taft, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Diamond v. City of TaftDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1998
- Lim v. City of Long BeachDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.