Legal Opinion

St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2000No. ED 75241PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY K. HOFF, Judge.

B.A.P., Incorporated, (B.A.P.) appeals from the trial court’s Amended Judg ment (Judgment) entered in favor of St. Louis County, Missouri, (County) and against B.A.P. after a non-jury trial to resolve Free Speech challenges to location restrictions on adult businesses set forth in County’s zoning ordinance and licensing ordinance. 2 We affirm.

Through passage of Ordinance No. 17,-621 in 1995, County amended its zoning ordinance by enacting regulations pertaining to the location of businesses selling sexual devices or other sexually explicit materials. We refer to that…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Sable Communications of California, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. World Wide Video, Inc. v. City of TukwilaWashington Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. St. Louis County v. B.A.P., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Keefhaver v. KimbrellMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Midvale City Corp. v. HaltomUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Pack Shack, Inc. v. Howard CountyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. Midwest Asbestos Abatement Corp. v. BrooksMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API