Legal Opinion

Philip Young v. City of Simi Valley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 20, 2000No. 97-56484PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge TASHIMA; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’SCANNLAIN.

TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:

The City of Simi Valley (“Simi Valley” or the “City”) appeals from the district court’s order declaring its adult business zoning ordinance unconstitutional and granting an injunction barring its enforcement. We must decide two issues: whether a zoning ordinance that allows “sensitive use”1 establishments to apply for an over-the-counter zoning clearance and disqualify a pending adult use permit is constitutional; and whether the existence of four potential, simultaneously available…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Clark v. Community for Creative Non-ViolenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of LakewoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Dream Palace v. County of MaricopaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  3. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Psychoanalysis v. California Board of PsychologyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Tollis, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Recycle for Change v. City of OaklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API