Legal Opinion

Scholten v. Blackhawk Partners

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 3, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 93-0245PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEISBERG, Judge.

Plaintiffs sued for a declaratory judgment holding that an amendment to the restrictive covenants of the Willow Creek Heights Subdivision was not yet in effect. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment, thereby concluding that the subject amendment had taken effect. We, however, conclude otherwise.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

The parties own lots in the Willow Creek Heights Subdivision (“subdivision”), which are subject to a number of restrictive covenants created on August 23, 1960, when the Amended Declaration of Restrictions was recorded in the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Boyles v. HausmannNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Gillespie Land and Irrigation Company v. GonzalezArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Duffy v. Sunburst Farms East Mutual Water & Agricultural Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Arizona Biltmore Estates Ass'n v. TezakCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Ahwatukee Custom Estates Management Ass'n v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. City of Tucson v. Whiteco Metrocom, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  5. Burke v. Voicestream Wireless Corp. IICourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API