Legal Opinion

Boyles v. Hausmann

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1994No. S-92-204PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This appeal arises from an action filed by appellants, Larry R. Boyles and Olga J. Boyles, seeking to declare that a restrictive covenant on their real property is invalid. After a bench trial the district court entered an order declaring the covenants valid. The Nebraska Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the district court. Boyles v. Hausmann, 2 Neb. App. 388, 509 N.W.2d 676 (1993). We modify and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

On August 14, 1977, appellants purchased Lot 18 of the Pioneer Hills Subdivision. The Pioneer Hills Subdivision is located at Section 7, Township…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Lakeland Property Owners Ass'n v. LarsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. Baker's Supermarkets, Inc. v. FeldmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. Spire v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Van Deusen v. BussmannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1939

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. Chiwawa Communities Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Shafer v. Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  3. SMDfund, Inc. v. Fort Wayne-Allen County Airport AuthorityIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Armstrong v. Ledges Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Evergreen Highlands Ass'n v. WestSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API