Legal Opinion
City of San Diego v. Sobke
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 30, 1998No. D025650PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KREMER, P. J.
In these consolidated eminent domain actions brought by the City of San Diego (City), defendants Fred Sobke and Jesus Monzon appeal a judgment under Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 631.8 favoring the City on their claim for compensation for lost goodwill. Defendants assert prejudicial evidentiary error. We affirm the judgment.
I
Introduction
Under the names Baja-Mex Insurance Services, Incorporated, and BajaMex Insurance and Money Exchange, defendants Sobke and Monzon operated businesses as tenants on two adjacent parcels condemned by the City for road improvement purposes.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FosterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- People Ex Rel. Department of Transportation v. MullerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Korsak v. Atlas Hotels, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Ex Rel. State Reclamation Board v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Redevelopment Agency v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jennings v. Palomar Pomerado Health Systems, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Red Mountain, LLC v. Fallbrook Public Utility DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Inglewood Redevelopment Agency v. AkliluCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Redevelopment Agency of San Diego v. MesdaqCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- People ex rel. Department of Transportation v. Dry Canyon Enterprises, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.