Legal Opinion
State v. Louise-Julie
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 28, 2000No. AC 19477; AC 19479PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
The defendants, Guy Louise-Julie and Ann Louise-Julie, appeal from the trial court’s denial of their motions to vacate their guilty pleas.1 On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly denied their motions because their separate trial counsels were ineffective when they (1) failed to conduct aproper forensic investigation, (2) did not prepare for trial, (3) first advised the defendants that their trial was going forward shortly before the trial was scheduled to begin, thereby depriving them of time to review and consider their options, and (4) advised the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RothenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Wolk v. WolkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Holley v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Baillargeon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- McCook v. Whitebirch Construction, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Mokonnen v. Pro Park, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Ceslik v. WinerConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.