Legal Opinion
State v. Rothenberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 19, 1985No. 11883PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.
The principal issue in this appeal is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction of the defendant, Mitchell Rothenberg, of sexual assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § ñSa-TO1 and of unlawful restraint in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-95.2 After a trial to the court, the defendant was found guilty on both charges and judgment was rendered accordingly. The defendant appeals from the judgment against him.
The trial court reasonably found the following facts. The defendant and the complainant met at a bar in Southbury during the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Connecticut v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Finley v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. PrioleauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. SinclairSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.