Kramer v. City of Hayward
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The plaintiff set out to recover from the city of Hayward or the town of Hayward, or both, the damages he incurred when his supper club and bowling alley caught fire and burned. The trial court held that neither the city nor the town was liable, and we agree.
City of Hayward.
Conceding that the city had no statutory duty to respond to a fire outside its city limits, plaintiff seeks to hold the city liable under one of three theories: (1) Liability to a third-party beneficiary under an implied contract; (2) tort liability based on negligent performance of a duty arising out of an implied…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Maier v. Racine CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Wulf v. RebbunWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
- Eau Claire National Bank v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Law Enforcement Standards Board v. Village of Lyndon StationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- In Interest of PAKWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- Stromsted v. St. Michael Hospital of Franciscan SistersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Schlosser v. Allis-Chalmers Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.