Legal Opinion

Wulf v. Rebbun

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1964PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether the cross complaints state a cause of action. Pleadings on demurrer are to be liberally construed with a view to substantial justice to the parties and are entitled to all reasonable inferences in favor of the pleading which can be drawn from the facts pleaded. Secs. 263.07, 263.27, Stats.; D’Angelo v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co. (1963), 19 Wis. (2d) 390, 120 N. W. (2d) 70; Arnold Joerns Co. v. Roberts (1962), 16 Wis. (2d) 333, 114 N. W. (2d) 416. The appellants correctly point out that in negligence actions pleadings are sufficient if they allege…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Pfeifer v. Standard Gateway Theater, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Firkus v. RombalskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Colton v. FoulkesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  5. D'ANGELO v. Cornell Paperboard Products Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Wilson v. Continental Insurance CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Northwestern Motor Car, Inc. v. PopeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Weiss v. HolmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Stephenson v. Universal Metrics, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API