Legal Opinion
Metzke v. May Department Stores Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 10, 1995No. Civ. A. 89-1334PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COHILL, District Judge.
Before the Court is a motion for partial summary judgment filed by defendant The May Department Stores Company (May) in response to the second amended complaint filed by plaintiffs Mary L. Metzke and Designs by Metzke, Inc. The second amended complaint has four counts: copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (Count I), trademark infringement and unfair competition under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) (the “Lanham Act counts”) (Counts II, III), and an apparent request for willful infringement damages and attorney’s fees under 17 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cable/Home Communication Corp. v. Network Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. v. Redd Horne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Robert G. Boyle v. The Governor's Veterans Outreach & Assistance CenterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armstrong v. Virgin Records, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Rundquist v. VAPIANO SEDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Trustees of Columbia University v. Roche Diagnostics GmbHDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Rundquist v. Vapiano AgDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011