Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Virgin Records, Ltd.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 3, 2000No. 98 CIV. 4645 RWSPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiff Ralphe A. Armstrong (“Armstrong”) has moved, pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for summary judgment striking various affirmative defenses raised by the defendants in this action. In turn, defendants EMI Group, pic (“EMI Group”), Virgin Records Ltd. (“Virgin UK”), Virgin Records America (“Virgin America”), Island Music, Ltd. (“Island”), and Robert Del Naja, Grantley Marshall, and Andrew Vowles, jointly doing business as “Massive Attack” (“Massive Attack”), have moved for summary judgment dismissing or delimiting a number of…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gershwin Publishing Corporation v. Columbia Artists Management, Inc., and Community Concerts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Lipton v. Nature Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Brady v. Town of ColchesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hubbard v. KelleyDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2009
- Carell v. Shubert Organization, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Gucci America, Inc. v. Frontline Processing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Auscape International v. National Geographic SocietyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.