Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jacaruso v. Lebski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 1, 2009No. AC 30150Published

1DissentBishop, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether the automobile insurance policy (policy) issued by the defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company to the plaintiff, Margaret Jacaruso, provides for a reduction of the monetary limits of her uninsured-underinsured motorist coverage for amounts paid to a third party under the same policy’s liability coverage. Although such a reduction is permissible pursuant to § 38a-334-6 (d) (1) (C) of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, I do not believe that the language of the policy issued by the defendant provides for such a reduction. Accordingly, I…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. American Universal Insurance v. DelGrecoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Stephan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Orkney v. Hanover InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API