Legal Opinion

Jacaruso v. Lebski

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided December 1, 2009No. AC 30150PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FOTI, J.

This appeal arises from an action seeking recovery pursuant to the uninsured-underinsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy (policy) issued by the defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company1 to the plaintiff, Margaret Jacaruso. Jacaruso appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting the defendant’s motion for summary judgment and denying her cross motion for summary judgment. The court concluded that there were no genuine issues of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to judgment as a matter of law because under the clear and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doucette v. PomesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Roy v. Centennial InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Stephan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. Vibert v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  5. Vitti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edelman v. PageConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  2. Lane v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty InsuranceConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  3. Guarino v. Allstate Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Jacaruso v. LebskiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API