Brobst v. Brobst
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Assumpsit by Almeda Brobst against Henry Brobst. on a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtPerson, J.
The plaintiff brought this action upon a promissory note for $700 and interest, payable to the order of one Almanda Adams, and purporting to be signed by the defendant. Almanda Adams, the payee in the note, died intestate on the 19th day of February, 1913; and on the 23d day of June, 1913, the other heirs and distributees of her estate assigned in writing all of their interest in the note to the plaintiff, who was one of the daughters of the deceased payee. No administration was had of Mrs. Adams’ estate, and plaintiff’s only title to the note comes *65through the assignment, and the fact that…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- Buchanan v. BuchananSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
- Foote v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
- Miller v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Cullen v. O'HaraMichigan Supreme Court · 1856
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- Wright v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Weis v. Kundert, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Glass v. CrossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
- Reichert v. Bay City BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.