Legal Opinion

Miller v. Clark

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1885PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Bay. (Green, J.) Ejectment. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

Plaintiffs brought ejectment to recover the premises known as lot numbered 12, in block numbered 72, in that part of Bay City, which was formerly Lower Saginaw, according to the plat of Lower Saginaw, in Bay county, *339Michigan. They claim title in fee. The defense was the .general issue, and claim for compensation for improvements ■under Comp. L. (1871), § 6252 as amended in 1875. The plaintiffs filed a request that the jury should find the value •of the premises at the time of trial, if no buildings had been •erected, or improvements made, or waste committed. The jury found a verdict for the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Lee v. ClaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Niles v. RansfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1849
  4. Shackleford v. BaileyIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
  5. Woodward v. BlanchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1855

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kim v. Jpmorgan Chase Bank, NaMichigan Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Bausman v. KelleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  3. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Backus v. BurkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  5. Michigan Trust Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API