Legal Opinion

Cullen v. O'Hara

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1856PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Washtenaw Circurt Court. The case is fully stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglass, J.

This was an action of trover for divers pieces of gold coin, amounting in all to $585, and was brought by O’Hara as the Administrator of Ann O’Brien, deceased, against Cullen. The cause was tried by a jury. On the trial, the plaintiff below proved his appointment as Administrator; that in November, 1848, his intestate died possessed of the money; that on her death it came into'the possession of the defendant, and that on demand made he refused to deliver it to the plaintiff.

The defendant proved that one James O’Brien, a brother of the plaintiff’s intestate, died intestate in New York, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hyde v. StoneNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. Campbell v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1827
  3. Harker v. DementCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1850

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. New England Box Co. v. C & R Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Howard v. PatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Shattuck v. WatsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Murphy v. HanrahanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API