Legal Opinion
Board of Regents of University of Minnesota v. Royal Insurance Co. of America
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided July 6, 1993No. Nos. C1-93-24, C8-93-36 and C5-93-186PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge.
The Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota (the regents) commenced an action against Asbestospray Corporation seeking damages associated with the abatement of asbestos-containing insulation in various buildings in the University of Minnesota and State University System. The complaint was subsequently amended to name H & A Construction, formerly known as Spraycraft Corporation, as a defendant. Before trial of the matter was completed, the parties entered into a Miller-Shugart settlement.
The regents then brought the present action to enforce the settlement against…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Allstate Insurance v. HagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Rapid-American Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Milkovich v. SaariSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Board of Regents v. Royal Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
- Medtronic, Inc. v. Advanced Bionics Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Gamble Farm Inn, Inc. v. Selective InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Bureau Of Engraving, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- American States Insurance v. Mankato Iron & Metal, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.