Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Short v. Riedell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 21, 1924No. 14898PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C.

This action in the nature of quo warranto was commenced in the district court of Oklahoma county by the State, on the relation of the Attorney General and the State Board of Accountancy, to oust the defendants from the exercise of what is termed as a franchise, that is, the holding themselves exit to the public, ana practicing, as professional or expert public accountants and auditors for compensation, without having first appeared before the State Board of Accountancy and stood an examination and received a certificate from that board authorizing them to engage in that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Allgeyer v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Lehmann v. State Board of Public AccountancySupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  5. State v. De VergesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Stroud v. Arthur Andersen & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  2. Cornell v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Moore v. GrillisMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Semke v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Motor Vehicle CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  5. Texas State Board of Public Accountancy v. FulcherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API