Legal Opinion

Flug v. University of Oregon

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 2003No. CC 16-96-04247; CAA99397; SC S48434PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

Plaintiff brought this action against her former employer, the University of Oregon (defendant), alleging two counts of unlawful employment practices under ORS chapter 659 and one count of intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED). The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, concluding, inter alia, that plaintiff had failed to give timely notice of her IIED claim, as ORS 30.275 requires. 1 The Court of Appeals affirmed, rejecting plaintiffs argument that certain letters that her lawyers had sent to defendant amounted to “actual notice” of her IIED claim within the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Jones v. General Motors Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Adams v. Oregon State PoliceOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Flug v. University of OregonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Pollock v. DR Horton, Inc.-PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. Shepard v. City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2011
  3. In Defense of Animals v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. Dept. of Human Services v. L. J. W.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  5. Heng-Nguyen v. Tigard-Tualatin School District 23JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API