Inzano v. Johnston
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
Plaintiff is appealing the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Lake County in which the trial court overrruled plaintiffs motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict which was in favor of defendant.
On December 10, 1982, plaintiff, age sixty-one, went to the office of defendant, an opthalmologist, in Mentor, Ohio, to have her eyes examined because she had blurred vision and severe headaches. During the course of such examination, eye drops were placed in plaintiffs eyes to dilate the pupils.
Upon examination, defendant informed plaintiff that she had two cataracts on her left eye which…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- Jordan v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Bruni v. TatsumiOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FerreiraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Heimberger v. Zeal Hotel Group, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Air-Ride v. Dhl Express (Usa), Ca2008-01-001 (11-3-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Steigerwald v. Branagan, 07 Je 25 (3-18-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008