Morriss v. Home Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to set aside an order dismissing the complaint after the trial.of the action.
1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.
This is a motion to set aside an order dismissing the complaint after the trial of the action. The *304action is brought to recover upon a fire insurance policy issued by the defendant, but, as claimed by defendant, never delivered to the plaintiff. Plaintiff authorized one Dannenberg, an insurance broker, to procure certain fire insurance for him. It was their first transaction. Dannenberg testified i hat he told the plaintiff it was to be a cash transaction, “ C. O. D.,” as he expressed it, and that he wanted the premium paid before' he delivered the policy. The policy of insurance was obtained…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Stone v. Franklin Fire Insurance Co. of BostonNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Northrup v. PizaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899
- Healy v. Insurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- Ikeller v. Hartford Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Condon v. Exton-Hall Brokerage & Vessel AgencyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1913
- Wright v. American Equitable Assurance Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Belfrom v. Community Brokerage Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1991
- Catlin Specially Insurance v. American Superconductor Corp.Massachusetts Superior Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.