Legal Opinion
Ikeller v. Hartford Fire Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 15, 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Action, upon a policy of fire insurance.
1Opinion of the CourtSpring, J.
The plaintiff for several.years had insured his propr erty through Ingham & Fannan, local insurance agents, located at *137Hume, Allegany county. As the plaintiff was aware, his property, for some reasons not appearing, was regarded as an undesirable risk, and difficulties had arisen in effecting insurance upon it. The agents had been unable to procure, insurance in companies represented by them, and the policies had been placed by other local agents at their instance. These facts were known to the plaintiff. These agents represented the defendant within a prescribed territory, but the property…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Crown Point Iron Co. v. Ætna InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- Hermann v. Niagara Fire InsururanceNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Standard Oil Co. v. . Triumph Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boyce v. National Commercial Bank & Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Pelaggi Co. v. Orient Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1930
- Shippers' Compress Co. v. Northern Assur. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Morriss v. Home InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1912
- Ohio Farmers Insurance v. HunterIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.